https://www.dlsite.com/maniax/work/=/product_id/RJ01316716.html Invisible AI tag

@Tompte Can't be so sure about this artist, their work predates AI art generators, their style is just very close to what most AI generates out of the box. Granted, they definitely could have transitioned to use AI for their work and not tell anyone.

@IggyC No need to tell me. I think I'll stick to my guns on this one. The way I see it, the odds are in my favor.

With the constant hair and eye changes more likely AI than not.

Any artist with an artstyle "close to AI" needs to give up and do something else or accept that their work is basically AI slop now because that's what everyone's going to think without caring a damn about one nameless casualty, as seen above.

what if this artist's style is what has been fed to most AIs? The work of this artist looks AI even before AI art was a thing lmao

@IggyC you can pass any of the images on dlsite to a site such as "haveibeentrained", it'll tell you it's AI

I see nothing stops them, so I'll leave it as it is. No matter how much people argue, it is the fact that b-ginga's artstyl- Or rather, A.I.'s artstyle is already similar to the said artist. And that fact will keep getting re-used as logic to debate back. In a way, personally, its actually good since there are people indeed got fooled by it. ...So, be proud O'those ye who capable to differentiate between them, you're not blinded, and refuse to be blinded. Thus, ye did not belong to the lower ground, get to the higher ground, leave those useless debate. They're wasting your time. Ohey, just entered comments section out of confusion, reader? Long story, short. I'll go ahead and say "Artwork is not [Made in A.I.]".